Etymology[ edit ] Though several earlier usages are known, dystopia was used as an antonym for Utopia by John Stuart Mill in one of his Parliamentary Speeches Hansard Commons by adding the prefix "dys" Ancient Greek: What is commonly called Utopian is something too good to be practicable; but what they appear to favour is too bad to be practicable".
FEW public men in any country have been made the subject of so much hostile criticism as Benjamin Disraeli. The most powerful section of the press in England has always been opposed to him.
The rising young Radicals, whether in Parliament or out of it, have found him a conven- ient object for those vigorous denunci- ations which are usually accepted as a proof of superior sagacity and fidelity to party.
The Conservative organs in England, and especially in Lon- don, have not exercised great influ- ence over public opinion during the last thirty years, and what little they possessed has more frequently been thrown against Mr. Disraeli than in his favor.
The Quarterly Review has never had a good word to say for him. He has had no friends among journal- ists, and has never sought to make any.
He has never tried to conciliate the forces which control, or are sup- posed to control, public opinion. Three times he has led that party to power in the teeth of apparently insurmountable difficul- ties. Three times he has held the great position of Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Once, already, he has been Prime Min- ister; a second time the Queen invited him to take upon his shoulders the cares and responsibilities of that post and the hour is probably approaching when he will be called to office under circumstances better calculated to do him justice than any which have hith- erto marked his career.
If he is the giddy adventurer, the empty charlatan, the unprincipled intriguer that the world has been taught to believe, how has all this success been achieved? It is not customary in English poli- tics to see adventurers climb slowly to power, and survive the test of thirty years of public life.
The highest place in the English goveinment is not to be won by imposters. There must be something more in Mr. Disraelis his- tory than most of his critics are willing to have us suppose. To the young especially it will be full of in- valuable lessons, lessons which are never so forcibly presented as through the medium of example.
The advan- tages of intrepidity, patience, and steadfast endurance in the battle of life were never set forth in a more striking manner.
Few young men can enter upon the active business of the world under more discouraging condi- tions than those which attended the early lot of Disraeli. In a country where wealth and family connections are important auxiliaries to success, and at a time when they were much more important than they are now, Disraeli the younger began as a clerk in a lawyers office without a shilling in the world.
Under a social system in which powerful friends are almost indispensable, at least to ad- vancement in political life, he stood alone. At a period when no man was thought fit to enter Parliament who was not either a landed proprietor himself or had one for a patron, he forced his way into the House of Com- mons, boasting that literature was his only escutcheon.
He made friends as he grew older; but it was only by the commanding force of his genius, by his calm, invincible resolu- tion, and by the un6inching nerve with which he confronted every difficulty. The world honors courage, and when the world tried to beat down Disraeli, and he beat it down instead, it became his friend.
But, for long and weary years, it was an apparently hopeless contest. The only friendly hand ex- tended to him was the hand of that woman whose remains he followed to a wintry grave last December, amid a blinding snow-storm, bareheaded and alone. If anybody desires to know what a wife may be to her husband, with what pure unselfishness and devo- tion she can give up everything that she has to his service, and find a noble happiness in doing it what a support and comfort she can be to him under the inevitable sorrows and misfortunes of life; how magnificently she can in- spire him to fresh exertions, and stand as a bulwark between the adverse world and himself, any one who wishes to comprehend all this need only read the story f Mr.
It will be found that in such a case the devotion is not all on one side. The affection of a good wo- man kindles the nobler qualities of a man, and he will repay her devotion with lofty fidelity.
Disraeli had, as he once said, the best of wives, he, on his part, proved the best of hus- bands. Till the last day of her life he paid to his wife those attentions which are too often associated rather with the romance of youthful intercourse than with the routine of married life.
When he rose to the highest point of his am- bition, the only favor he would accept of the Queen was a coronet for his wife.
He was scarcely ever absent from her side until the dark day when the fast friends were to be parted. She knew that she was dying, but refrained from telling him so, in order that he might be spared the pain of bidding her fare- well.
He also knew that her last hour was at hand, but kept silence lest he should distress her. Thus they part- ed, each anxious to avoid striking a blow at the others heart. The domes- tic lives of public men are properly held to be beyond the range of public comment ; but in an age when marriage is the theme of ridicule from leaders of progress it may be that this pas- sage in Mr.
Disraelis career may be pondered with some profit by the young. Disraelis connection with the literature and politics of his country has been of a very active kind for up- wards of six-and-forty years.
Although he boasts that he was born in a li- brary, there is little of the spirit of a recluse in his temperament. Wher- ever hard blows were to be given or taken, there was he to be found. The speech Benjamin Disraeli. Peter in his hand.
The House laughed him down. I am not at all surprised at the reception I have met with, said he.Jump to navigation Jump to search Jump to search. Scribd es red social de lectura y publicación más importante del mundo. Christopher Collins in Evgenij Zamjatin: Jerome’s short essay "The New Utopia" () the author died less than four months after its publication.
The Brothers Karamazov is a philosophical novel set in 19th-century Russia, that enters deeply into the ethical debates of God, free will. It is a drama of moral struggles concerning faith. A Royal Economic Society Publication Edited by JOHN K. WHITAKER University of Virginia are of considerable importance, although dwarfed by his philosophical writings.
Jannet, Claudio (—94). French economist and economic historian. and to substitute for it a triennial Essay Prize, the Essays for which should be sent in at times. A dystopia (from the Greek δυσ- "bad" and τόπος "place"; alternatively, cacotopia, kakotopia, or simply anti-utopia) is a community or society that is .
Jump to navigation Jump to search Jump to search.